`PseudoR2.Rd`

Although there's no commonly accepted agreement on how to assess the fit of a logistic regression, there are some approaches. The goodness of fit of the logistic regression model can be expressed by some variants of pseudo R squared statistics, most of which being based on the deviance of the model.

PseudoR2(x, which = NULL)

x | the |
---|---|

which | character, one out of |

Cox and Snell's \(R^2\) is based on the log likelihood for the model compared to the log likelihood for a baseline model. However, with categorical outcomes, it has a theoretical maximum value of less than 1, even for a "perfect" model.

Nagelkerke's \(R^2\) (also sometimes called Cragg-Uhler) is an adjusted version of the Cox and Snell's \(R^2\) that adjusts the scale of the statistic to cover the full range from 0 to 1.

McFadden's \(R^2\) is another version, based on the log-likelihood kernels for the intercept-only model and the full estimated model.

Veall and Zimmermann concluded that from a set of six widely used measures the measure suggested by McKelvey and Zavoina had the closest correspondance to ordinary least square R2. The Aldrich-Nelson pseudo-R2 with the Veall-Zimmermann correction is the best approximation of the McKelvey-Zavoina pseudo-R2. Efron, Aldrich-Nelson, McFadden and Nagelkerke approaches severely underestimate the "true R2".

the value of the specific statistic. `AIC`

, `LogLik`

, `LogLikNull`

and `G2`

will only be reported with option `"all"`

.

McFadden pseudo-\(R^2\)

McFadden adjusted pseudo-\(R^2\)

Cox and Snell pseudo-\(R^2\) (also known as ML pseudo-\(R^2\))

Nagelkerke pseudo\(R^2\) (also known as CraggUhler \(R^2\))

AldrichNelson pseudo-\(R^2\)

VeallZimmermann pseudo-\(R^2\)

McKelvey and Zavoina pseudo-\(R^2\)

Efron pseudo-\(R^2\)

Tjur's pseudo-\(R^2\)

Akaike's information criterion

log-Likelihood for the fitted model (by maximum likelihood)

log-Likelihood for the null model. The null model will include the offset, and an intercept if there is one in the model.

differenz of the null deviance - model deviance

Aldrich, J. H. and Nelson, F. D. (1984): Linear Probability, Logit, and probit Models, *Sage
University Press*, Beverly Hills.

Cox D R & Snell E J (1989) *The Analysis of Binary Data* 2nd ed. London: Chapman and Hall.

Efron, B. (1978). Regression and ANOVA with zero-one data: Measures of residual variation. *Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73*(361), 113--121.

Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). *Applied logistic regression* (2nd ed.). Hoboke, NJ: Wiley.

McFadden D (1979). Quantitative methods for analysing travel behavior of individuals: Some recent developments. In D. A. Hensher & P. R. Stopher (Eds.), *Behavioural travel modelling* (pp. 279-318). London: Croom Helm.

McKelvey, R. D., & Zavoina, W. (1975). A statistical model for the analysis of ordinal level dependent variables. *The Journal of Mathematical Sociology, 4*(1), 103--120

Nagelkerke, N. J. D. (1991). A note on a general definition of the coefficient of determination. *Biometrika, 78*(3), 691--692.

Tjur, T. (2009) Coefficients of determination in logistic regression models -
a new proposal: The coefficient of discrimination. *The American
Statistician*,
63(4): 366-372

Veall, M.R., & Zimmermann, K.F. (1992) Evalutating Pseudo-R2's fpr binary probit models. *Quality&Quantity*, 28, pp. 151-164

Andri Signorell <andri@signorell.net> with contributions of Ben Mainwaring <benjamin.mainwaring@yougov.com> and Daniel Wollschlaeger

#> McFadden #> 0.2019875#> McFadden Nagelkerke #> 0.2019875 0.3135111