Calculate Goodman-Kruskal's tau, a measure of association for nominal variables in a two-way table. The function accepts either a contingency table or two vectors.
Arguments
- x
a vector (typically a factor, character, or numeric vector) containing categorical data, or a contingency table.
- y
NULL(default) or a vector with compatible dimensions tox. If supplied,table(x, y, \dots)is calculated.- conf.level
confidence level of the interval. If set to
NA(the default), only the point estimate is returned.- sides
character string specifying the sidedness of the confidence interval (one of
"two.sided"(default),"left"or"right"). SeeConfidenceIntervals().- direction
direction of the calculation. Must be
"row"(default) or"column"."row"gives tau (R|C), i.e. the row variable is the dependent one and is predicted from the column variable;"column"gives tau (C|R).- ...
further arguments are passed to the function
table(), allowing i.e. to set useNA. This refers only to the vector interface; supplying them withoutyis an error.
Value
if conf.level = NA, a numeric scalar. Otherwise a named
numeric vector with elements:
estpoint estimate of Goodman-Kruskal's tau
lcilower confidence interval bound
uciupper confidence interval bound
Details
Goodman-Kruskal tau measures association for cross tabulations of nominal level variables. Goodman-Kruskal tau is based on random category assignment. It measures the percentage improvement in predictability of the dependent variable (column or row variable) given the value of other variables (row or column variables). Goodman-Kruskal tau is the same as Goodman-Kruskal lambda except the calculations of the tau statistic are based on assignment probabilities specified by marginal or conditional proportions. Misclassification probabilities are based on random category assignment with probabilities specified by marginal or conditional proportion.
Goodman Kruskal tau reduces to \(\phi^2\) (see: phi()) in the
2x2-table case.
The measure lies in \([0, 1]\) by construction. Both ends are reached by cancellation, so an estimate within a few machine epsilons of a bound is reported as that bound. Tau is undefined when the dependent variable has fewer than two non-empty categories (the denominator is then zero), which is signalled with an error.
The confidence interval uses the asymptotic standard error of Liebetrau
(1983). That variance vanishes at both ends of the range: under exact
independence (\(\tau = 0\), where the limiting distribution is a weighted
sum of chi-square variables rather than normal) and under perfect
prediction (\(\tau = 1\)). Where the estimated standard error is zero the
interval would collapse to a single point and thus exclude every other
value, which no sample supports; the bounds are returned as NA with a
warning instead. Close to either end the normal approximation is poor and
the interval is too narrow.
References
Agresti, A. (2002) Categorical Data Analysis. John Wiley & Sons, pp. 57-59.
Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. H. (1954) Measures of association for cross classifications. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 49, 732-764.
Goodman, L. A., & Kruskal, W. H. (1963) Measures of association for cross classifications III: Approximate sampling theory. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 58, 310-364.
Liebetrau, A. M. (1983) Measures of Association, Sage University Papers Series on Quantitative Applications in the Social Sciences, 07-004. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, pp. 24–30
See also
lambda(), cramerV(),
Association()
Other assoc.nominal:
contCoef(),
cramerV(),
lambda(),
mutInf(),
phi(),
tschuprowT(),
uncertCoef(),
yule
Examples
# example in:
# http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statugfreq/63124/PDF/default/statugfreq.pdf
# pp. S. 1821
tab <- as.table(rbind(c(26,26,23,18,9),c(6,7,9,14,23)))
# Goodman Kruskal's tau C|R
gkTau(tab, direction="column", conf.level=0.95)
#> est lci uci
#> 0.041216580 0.009920576 0.072512583
# Goodman Kruskal's tau R|C
gkTau(tab, direction="row", conf.level=0.95)
#> est lci uci
#> 0.16523315 0.04921484 0.28125146
# http://support.sas.com/documentation/cdl/en/statugfreq/63124/PDF/default/statugfreq.pdf
# pp. 1814 (143)
tab <- as.table(cbind(c(11,2),c(4,6)))
gkTau(tab, direction="row", conf.level=0.95)
#> est lci uci
#> 0.2156410 0.0000000 0.5537724
gkTau(tab, direction="column", conf.level=0.95)
#> est lci uci
#> 0.2156410 0.0000000 0.5537724
# reduce both to:
phi(tab)^2
#> [1] 0.215641
# example 1 in Liebetrau (1983)
tt <- matrix(c(549,93,233,119,225,455,402,
212,124,78,42,41,12,132,
54,54,33,13,46,7,153), ncol=3,
dimnames=list(rownames=c("Gov", "Mil", "Edu", "Eco", "Intel", "Rel", "For"),
colnames=c("One", "Two", "Multi")))
gkTau(tt, direction = "row", conf.level = 0.95)
#> est lci uci
#> 0.02580507 0.02094902 0.03066113
gkTau(tt, direction = "column", conf.level = 0.95)
#> est lci uci
#> 0.08601920 0.07243943 0.09959897
# SPSS
ttt <- matrix(c(225,53,206,3,1,12), nrow=3,
dimnames=list(rownames=c("right","center", "left"),
colnames=c("us","ussr")))
round(gkTau(ttt, direction = "row", conf.level = 0.95), digits = 3)
#> est lci uci
#> 0.010 0.000 0.023
round(gkTau(ttt, direction = "column"), digits = 3)
#> [1] 0.013
